Professor, Posso Usar o Celular? Um Estudo sobre a Utilização do Sistema de Resposta do Estudante (SRE) no Processo Educativo de Alunos de Ciências Contábeis

Autores

  • Vitor Hideo Nasu Universidade de São Paulo
  • Luís Eduardo Afonso Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v12i2.1811

Palavras-chave:

Sistema de Resposta do Estudante, SRE, Alunos de contabilidade, Processo educacional, Educação contábil

Resumo

Objetivo: O artigo procura investigar a percepção dos alunos de Contabilidade sobre o uso do Sistema de Resposta do Estudante (SRE) no processo educacional. Método: Caracteriza-se por ser uma survey research, com utilização de abordagem quantitativa e que visa descrever a percepção de discentes de Ciências Contábeis. A investigação foi desenvolvida em uma IES pública com duas turmas da disciplina Contabilidade de entidades diversas durante o 1º e 2º bimestres do calendário acadêmico de 2016. Ao final do 2º bimestre, foram aplicados questionários para a obtenção dos dados. Resultados: O SRE é fácil de ser usado e torna as aulas mais interativas. Há forte relação entre as percepções de que o SRE ajuda os alunos como ferramenta didática e de que é benéfico para a aprendizagem. Verificou-se que não houve diferença significativa entre as percepções discentes entre classes acerca do uso do SRE. Contudo, foram encontradas diferenças relevantes de percepção quando da análise por gênero e por faixa de idade. Contribuições: Sustenta-se, por meio de evidências, que o SRE aprimora o processo educativo. Portanto, docentes podem utilizá-lo a fim de encorajar maior envolvimento e postura ativa dos alunos, além de proporcionar um ambiente diferenciado do ensino tradicional.

Biografia do Autor

Vitor Hideo Nasu, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutorando em Controladoria e Contabilidade pela Universidade de São Paulo.

Luís Eduardo Afonso, Universidade de São Paulo

Professor Associado do Departamento de Contabilidade e Atuária da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo.

Referências

Apostolou, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M. & Rebele, J. E. (2016). Accounting education literature review (2015). Journal of Accounting Education, 35, pp. 20–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.002

Beckert, E., Fauth, E. & Olsen, K. (2009). Clicker satisfaction for students in human development : differences for class type , prior exposure , and student talkativity. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(11), pp. 599–612. Retrieved from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/North-American-Journal-Psychology/213084801.html

Beekes, W. (2006). The “Millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), pp 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787406061143

Beekes, W. (2009). Is that your final answer? Encouraging student participation using a personal response system. The Enhancing Series Case Studies: Student Centred Learning in Business and Management, Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, Tourism., pp. 76–86. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/47175/

Behn, B. K., Ezzell, W. F., Murphy, L. A., Rayburn, J. D., Stith, M. T. & Strawser, J. R. (2012). The Pathways Commission on Accounting Higher Education: Charting a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(3), pp. 595–600. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-10300

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 6, pp 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06–12–0205

Carnaghan, C., Edmonds, T. P., Lechner, T. A. & Olds, P. R. (2011). Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations. Journal of Accounting Education, 29(4), pp. 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2012.05.002

Carnaghan, C. & Webb, A. (2007). Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning, and Engagement in Accounting Education. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), pp. 391–409. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.3.391

Chatham, M. D. & Davidson, D. (2011). Assessing student and instructor satisfaction using an audience response system in Introductory Business Courses. Business Education Innovation Journal, 3(1), pp. 43–50. Retrieved from http://www.beijournal.com/images/V3N1Text.pdf

Cheong, C., Bruno, V. & Cheong, F. (2012). Designing a Mobile-app-based Collaborative Learning System. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11, pp. 97–119.

Chui, L., Martin, K. & Pike, B. (2013). A quasi-experimental assessment of interactive student response systems on student confidence, effort, and course performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 31(1), pp. 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.01.002

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Cohn, E. & Johnson, E. (2006). Class Attendance and Performance in Principles of Economics. Education Economics, 14(2), pp. 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290600622954

Cozby, P. C. & Bates, S. C. (2012). Methods in behavioral research (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cummings, R. G. & Hsu, M. (2007). The effects of student response systems on performance and satisfaction: an investigation in a tax accounting class. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(12), pp. 21–26. Retrieved from https://www.cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/TLC/article/download/1508/1488/

Cunningham, B. M. (2008). Using Action Research to Improve Learning and the Classroom Learning Environment. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(1), pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2008.23.1.1

Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers : A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5(1), pp. 70–88. Retrieved from http://ltech.nwfsc.edu/clickers/clickers a new teaching aid with exceptional promise 2006.pdf

Edmonds, C. T. & Edmonds, T. P. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of SRS Technology on Introductory Managerial Accounting Students. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(3), pp. 421–434. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2008.23.3.421

Edmonds, C. T. & Edmonds, T. P. (2010). An examination of the links between SRS technology and an active learning environment in a managerial accounting course. In A. H. Catanach & D. Feldmann (Eds.), Advances in Accounting Education (pp. 81–100). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-4622(2010)0000011007

Eng, L. L., Lea, B.-R. & Cai, R. (2013). Use of Clickers for Assurance of Learning in Introductory Financial Accounting. In Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations,14, pp. 269–291). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-4622(2013)0000014018

Freeman, M., Blayney, P. & Ginns, P. (2006). Anonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), pp. 568–580. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/freeman.html

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: an introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Gaviria, D., Arango, J. & Valencia, A. (2015). Reflections about the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Accounting Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, pp. 992–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.569

Humphries, S. A. & Whelan, C. (2009). Effectiveness of Interactive Technology in Business Education. Business Education Innovation Journal, 1(2), pp. 56–61. Retrieved from http://beijournal.com/images/Journal_final_V1N2.pdf#page=56

Kay, R. H. & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), pp. 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001

Kulik, J. A. & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), pp. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079

Lea, B.-R. (2008). Clickers Adoption in a Small Class Setting. Decision Line, 39(4), 7–11. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7191/0d6e1f0fc4cc2da02467f76c51b2a327f363.pdf

Marshall, L. L. & Varnon, A. W. (2012). An Empirical Investigation of Clicker Technology in Financial Accounting Principles. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), pp. 7–18. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d3e3/181482beabceb03cd2dd50f0f8dd5f9cc4fd.pdf#page=14

Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Mula, J. M. & Kavanagh, M. (2009). Click Go the Students , Click-Click-Click : The efficacy of a student response system for engaging students to improve feedback and performance. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 3(1), pp. 1–17. Retrieved from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/5859/

Pathways Commission. (2012). The Pathways Commission: Charting a national strategy for the next generation of accountants. Retrieved from http://commons.aaahq.org/posts/a3470e7ffa

Premuroso, R. F., Tong, L. & Beed, T. K. (2011). Does using clickers in the classroom matter to student performance and satisfaction when taking the introductory financial accounting course? Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), pp. 701–723. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50066

Segovia, J. (2006). The use of personal response system in accounting courses. Accounting Instructors’ Report, Winter. Retrieved from https://blog.cengage.com/use-personal-response-system-accounting-courses/

Segovia, J. (2008). Personal response system and its effects on student learning. Accounting Instructors’ Report, Winter, pp. 1–5. Retrieved from https://blog.cengage.com/personal-response-system-effects-student-learning/

Smith, M. (2015). Research methods in accounting (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Sprague, E. W. & Dahl, D. W. (2010). Learning to click: An evaluation of the personal response system clicker technology in introductory marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), pp. 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475309344806

Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching With Clickers. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching - Occasional Papers, pp. 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.crlt.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource_files/CRLT_no22.pdf

Downloads

Publicado

29-06-2018

Como Citar

Nasu, V. H., & Afonso, L. E. (2018). Professor, Posso Usar o Celular? Um Estudo sobre a Utilização do Sistema de Resposta do Estudante (SRE) no Processo Educativo de Alunos de Ciências Contábeis. Revista De Educação E Pesquisa Em Contabilidade (REPeC), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v12i2.1811

Edição

v. 12 n. 2 (2018): Abril-Junho

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem ou criem obras derivadas, mesmo que para uso com fins comerciais, contanto que seja dado crédito pela criação original.

b) Não cabe aos autores compensação financeira a qualquer título, por artigos ou resenhas publicados na REPeC.

c) Os artigos e resenhas publicados na REPeC são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores.

d) Após sua aprovação, os autores serão identificados em cada artigo, devendo informar à REPeC sua instituição de ensino/pesquisa de vínculo e seu endereço completo.