Relação entre a informatividade do ativo contábil e o risco sistemático das empresas brasileiras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v18i1.3322Palavras-chave:
Informatividade do ativo, Capital econômico, Qualidade da informação contábil, Risco sistemático, Custo de CapitalResumo
Objetivo: Este estudo objetiva analisar eventual relação entre a informatividade do ativo contábil e o risco
sistemático das empresas brasileiras. A hipótese de pesquisa parte do pressuposto de que a percepção
de risco dos investidores se reduz com fatores que restringem a sua incerteza, dentre eles, uma melhor
qualidade da informação.
Método: Para alcançar o objetivo, foram estimadas regressões com dados em painel, empregando-se
dados de 186 empresas, de 2010 a 2021. A análise contemplou, além da informatividade global do ativo,
a informatividade resultante de escolhas da empresa (parte discricionária) e a informatividade inferida a
partir de empresas relacionadas do mesmo setor (parte não discricionária).
Resultados: A informatividade do ativo mostrou-se relevante e negativamente associada ao risco
sistemático das empresas brasileiras, sendo que a sua parte não discricionária apresentou efeito mais
intenso sobre o risco sistemático do que a parte discricionária.
Contribuições: O trabalho é relevante para usuários, preparadores e reguladores ao contribuir com a
discussão sobre qualidade da informação contábil evidenciando sua relação com o risco sistemático de
empresas por meio de medida focada no ativo, por sugerir métrica que pode auxiliar nas estimativas de
valor da empresa e por fornecer evidências das consequências econômicas das escolhas contábeis.
Referências
Andrei, D., Mann, W., & Moyen, N. (2019). Why did the q theory of investment start working?. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.03.007
Armstrong, C. S., Banerjee, S., & Corona, C. (2013). Factor-loading uncertainty and expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(1), 158-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs102
Atiase, R. K. (1985). Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490905
Bai, J., Philippon, T., & Savov, A. (2016). Have financial markets become more informative?. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 625-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.08.005
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 159-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490232
Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 77-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
Barth, M. E., Li, K., & McClure, C. G. (2023). Evolution in value relevance of accounting information. The Accounting Review, 98(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0521
Barton, S. L. (1988). Diversification strategy and systematic risk: Another look. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.5465/256503
Beaver, W. H. (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 67-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490070
Beaver, W., Kettler, P., & Scholes, M. (1970). The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures. The Accounting Review, 45(4), 654-682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/244204
Black, F. (1980). The magic in earnings: Economic earnings versus accounting earnings. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(6), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v36.n6.19
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
Castagna, A. D., & Matolcsy, Z. P. (1978). The relationship between accounting variables and systematic risk and the prediction of systematic risk. Australian Journal of Management, 3(2), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289627800300
Chen, Q., Schipper, K., & Zhang, N. (2022). Measuring Accounting Asset Informativeness. The Accounting Review, 97(4), 209-236. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0585
Damodaran, A. (2016). Damodaran on valuation: security analysis for investment and corporate finance. John Wiley & Sons.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1986). Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. Accounting review, 400-420. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247149
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 193-225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248303
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
Dichev, I. D., & Tang, V. W. (2009). Earnings volatility and earnings predictability. Journal of accounting and Economics, 47(1-2), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.09.005
Dutta, S., & Nezlobin, A. (2017). Dynamic effects of information disclosure on investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(2), 329-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12161
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Aconomics, 39(2), 295-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
Fuji, A. H. (2004). O conceito de lucro econômico no âmbito da contabilidade aplicada. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 15, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772004000300004
Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin's marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912538
Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
Hong, G., & Sarkar, S. (2007). Equity systematic risk (beta) and its determinants. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(2), 423-466. https://doi.org/10.1506/8187-56KM-6511-Q532
Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu143
Hughes, J. S., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2007). Information asymmetry, diversification, and cost of capital. The Accounting Review, 82(3), 705-729. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.705
International Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework/
Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
Jose, M. L., & Stevens, J. L. (1987). Product market structure, capital intensity, and systematic risk: empirical results from the theory of the firm. Journal of Financial Research, 10(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.1987.tb00488.x
Kanodia, C., Singh, R., & Spero, A. E. (2005). Imprecision in accounting measurement: Can it be value enhancing?. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 487-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00178.x
Kothari, S. P., Laguerre, T. E., & Leone, A. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(4), 355-382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020764227390
Koussis, N., & Makrominas, M. (2015). Growth options, option exercise and firms’ systematic risk. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 44, 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0405-5
Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 385-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x
Lev, B. (1974). On the association between operating leverage and risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9(4), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329764
Li, X., & Wibbens, P. D. (2023). Broken Effects? How to Reduce False Positives in Panel Regressions. Strategy Science, 8(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0172
Lintner, J. (1965). Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977249
Ma, M. (2017). Economic links and the spillover effect of earnings quality on market risk. The Accounting Review, 92(6), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51715
Mohanram, P. S. (2005). Separating winners from losers among lowbook-to-market stocks using financial statement analysis. Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 133-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1526-4
Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica: Journal of The Econometric Society, 768-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
Patton, A. J., & Verardo, M. (2012). Does beta move with news? Firm-specific information flows and learning about profitability. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(9), 2789-2839. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs073
Piotroski, J. D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., Jaffe, J. F., Jordan, B. D., Jaffe, J., & Jordan, B. (2002). Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Sarmiento-Sabogal, J., & Sadeghi, M. (2015). Estimating the cost of equity for private firms using accounting fundamentals. Applied Economics, 47(3), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.969826
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 823-853. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.823
Subrahmanyam, M. G., & Thomadakis, S. B. (1980). Systematic Risk and the Theory of the Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(3), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884578
Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1991374
Xing, X., & Yan, S. (2019). Accounting information quality and systematic risk. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0703-z
Xing, Y. (2008). Interpreting the value effect through the Q-theory: An empirical investigation. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1767-1795. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm051
Wiyono, E. R., & Mardijuwono, A. W. (2020). Leverage, Profitability, Firm Size, Exchange Rate, and Systematic Risk: Evidence from the Manufacturing Industry in Indonesia. Cuadernos de Economía, 442-448. https://cude.es/submit-a-manuscript/index.php/CUDE/article/view/28
Wu, J., Zhang, L., & Zhang, X. F. (2010). The q‐theory approach to understanding the accrual anomaly. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 177-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00353.x
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem ou criem obras derivadas, mesmo que para uso com fins comerciais, contanto que seja dado crédito pela criação original.
b) Não cabe aos autores compensação financeira a qualquer título, por artigos ou resenhas publicados na REPeC.
c) Os artigos e resenhas publicados na REPeC são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores.
d) Após sua aprovação, os autores serão identificados em cada artigo, devendo informar à REPeC sua instituição de ensino/pesquisa de vínculo e seu endereço completo.
