Efeitos do Compartilhamento de Informações no Risco e Desempenho da Aliança Estratégica de Cooperativas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v13i4.2295Keywords:
Compartilhamento de informações; Risco da aliança estratégica; Desempenho da aliança.Abstract
Objetivo: Este estudo analisa os efeitos do compartilhamento de informações no risco e desempenho da aliança estratégica de cooperativas, mediado pelo compartilhamento de conhecimento e vazamento de informações.
Método: Pesquisa de levantamento foi realizada em cooperativas agropecuárias listadas na Organização das Cooperativas Brasileiras (OCB) com gestores (gerente, supervisor, coordenador e controller) cadastrados na rede LinkedIn. O questionário foi enviado pela plataforma SurveyMonkey aos 516 gestores que aceitaram o convite e a amostra totalizou 96 respostas válidas. Para testar as hipóteses da pesquisa aplicou-se a técnica de modelagem de equações estruturais.
Resultados: Os resultados mostraram que o compartilhamento de informações impacta diretamente no compartilhamento de conhecimento, mas o mesmo não se observa na interação entre compartilhamento de informações e vazamento de informações. O vazamento de informações impacta diretamente no risco da aliança estratégica, do mesmo modo que o compartilhamento do conhecimento impacta no desempenho da aliança. Entretanto, o compartilhamento do conhecimento e o vazamento de informações não cumpriram os requisitos para demonstrar mediação na relação do compartilhamento de informações com risco da aliança estratégica e desempenho da aliança.
Contribuições: Instiga-se realizar pesquisas com outras mediações que possam elucidar as dissonâncias, como (des)confiança entre os membros da aliança estratégica.
References
Alves, A., & Barbosa, R.R. (2010). Influências e barreiras ao compartilhamento da informação: uma perspectiva teórica. Ciência da Informação, 39(2), 115-128.
Ansari, S.L. (1977). An integrated approach to control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(2), 101-112.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-182.
Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740-753.
Cheng, J.H. (2011). Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 31(4), 374-384.
Chen, S.S., Chuang, Y.W., & Chen, P.Y. (2012). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of KMS quality, KMS self-efficacy, and organizational climate. Knowledge-Based Systems, 31, 106-118.
Christensen, P.H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 36-47.
Christ, M.H., & Nicolaou, A.I. (2016). Integrated information systems, alliance formation, and the risk of information exchange between partners. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(3), 1-18.
Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
Connell, J., Kriz, A., & Thorpe, M. (2014). Industry clusters: an antidote for knowledge sharing and collaborative innovation? Journal of Knowledge Management,18(1), 137-151.
Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., & Navas-López, J.E. (2015). Absorbing knowledge from supply-chain, industry and science: The distinct moderating role of formal liaison devices on new product development and novelty. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 75-85.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S. (1996). Risk types and inter‐firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 827-843.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283.
Evans, K.S., & Weninger, Q. (2014). Information sharing and cooperative search in fisheries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(3), 353-372.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Fawcett, S.E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G.M., Brau, J.C., & McCarter, M.W. (2007). Information sharing and supply chain performance: The role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 358-368.
Fornell, C., David, F., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Galappaththi, E.K., Kodithuwakku, S.S., & Galappaththi, I.M. (2016). Can environment management integrate into supply chain management? Information sharing via shrimp aquaculture cooperatives in northwestern Sri Lanka. Marine Policy, 68, 187-194.
Goodhue, D.L., Wybo, M.D., & Kirsch, L.J. (1992). The impact of data integration on the costs and benefits of information systems. MiS Quarterly, 16(3), 293-311.
Gopal, R.D., Hidaji, H., Patterson, R.A., Rolland, E., & Zhdanov, D. (2018). How much to share with third parties? User privacy concerns and website dilemmas. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 143-164.
Hair Jr, J.F., Babin, B., Money, A.H., & Samouel, P. (2014). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman
Hueth, B., & Marcoul, P. (2006). Information sharing and oligopoly in agricultural markets: The role of the cooperative bargaining association. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 866-881.
Hu, H., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, M. (2017, October). A fast graphic-based information valuation algorithm for cooperative information sharing (pp. 1892-1897). Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), IEEE International Conference.
Khan, M., Hussain, M., & Saber, H.M. (2016). Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 208-214.
Kong, G., Rajagopalan, S., & Zhang, H. (2013). Revenue sharing and information leakage in a supply chain. Management Science, 59(3), 556-572.
Lechler, T., & Wetzel, S. (2017). Conceptualizing the silent risk of inadvertent information leakages. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 58, 67-75.
Lee, H.L., So, K.C., & Tang, C.S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626-643.
Lin, H.F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.
Manatsa, P.R., & McLaren, T.S. (2008). Information sharing in a supply chain: using agency theory to guide the design of incentives. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 9(1), 18-26.
Marshall, D.A. (2015). Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 4(4), 10-21.
Massaro, M., Moro, A., Aschauer, E., & Fink, M. (2017). Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Review of Managerial Science, 1-35.
McLaren, T., Head, M., & Yuan, Y. (2002). Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits. Internet Research, 12(4), 348-364.
Mojo, D., Fischer, C., & Degefa, T. (2015). Social and environmental impacts of agricultural cooperatives: evidence from Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 388-400.
Organizações de Cooperativas Brasileiras (OCB). Cooperativas. Recuperado em 08 junho, 2018, de http://www.ocb.org.br/servicos.
Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18-35.
Ringle, C.M., Silva, D., & Bido, D.S. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com utilização do Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56-73.
Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study. Technovation, 35, 22-31
Sheu, C., Yen, H.R., & Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 24-49.
Tan, K.H., Wong, W.P., & Chung, L. (2016). Information and knowledge leakage in supply chain. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 621-638.
Tomaél, M.I., & Marteleto, R.M. (2006). Redes sociais: posições dos atores no fluxo da informação. Encontros Bibli, Florianópolis, n. esp, 75-90.
Tran, T.T.H., Childerhouse, P., & Deakins, E. (2016). Supply chain information sharing: challenges and risk mitigation strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(8), 1102-1126.
Van den Abbeele, A. (2016). Discussion of integrated information systems, alliance formation, and the risk of information exchange between partners. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(3), 19-23.
Von Rheinbaben, J., & Ruckes, M. (2004). The number and the closeness of bank relationships. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(7), 1597-1615.
Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2017). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, Article in Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002.
Wu, L., Chuang, C.H., & Hsu, C.H. (2014). Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 148, 122-132.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, which allows the sharing of the work and recognition of authorship and its initial publication in this journal. This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, or create derivative works, even for commercial purposes, provided credit is given for the original creation.
b)There is no financial compensation to the authors in any capacity, for articles published in RePEc.c) The articles published in RePEc are the sole responsibility of the authors.