Advancing Grounded Theory in Accounting research through Situational Analysis:
a Postmodern Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v17i3.3221Keywords:
Situational analysis, Grounded theory, Post-modern perspective, Adele ClarkeAbstract
Objective: Revise and illustrate the Situational Analysis (SA) method and its theoretical and procedural assumptions to enable novel inductive inquiry in accounting studies.
Method: We develop a theoretical essay on SA advances Grounded Theory, addressing the challenges of social life in the postmodern world. The essay focus on how accounting researchers can explore SA in diverse projects, especially those requiring multiple data about a particular phenomenon, allowing researchers to integrate action in different contexts. SA’s analytical stance is structured through maps, embracing the notion of empirical evidence to promote epistemic diversity and multivocality and recognize the importance of non-human elements in structuring social relations.
Results: The paper presents an analytical alternative that is not limited to the micro, meso, or macro levels of events. Facing complexities, it provides relational views of ecologies of situations, repositioning research in individual, collective and discursive ways. With SA, a researcher can develop novel inquiry that challenges the status quo and unexplored facets of complex situations.
Contributions: The paper explores and illustrates the potential of a qualitative method not yet familiar to accounting researchers, bridging the gap between post-modern perspectives on discourse and investigation of agency on complex phenomena involving accounting concepts and mechanisms.
References
Ahrens, T. (1996). Styles of accountability. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 21(2/3), 139-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00052-6
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 31(8), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.007
Bartoluzzio, A. I. S. S., Rodrigues, S. V. M., Tavares, M. F., & Freitas, M. A. L. (2020). Participação e influência dos respondentes na definição dos elementos contábeis na nova estrutura conceitual para as entidades do setor público. Enfoque, 39(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v39i1.44658
Beattie, V. A., Fearnley, S., & Brandt, R. (2004). A grounded theory model of auditor-client negotiations. International Journal of Auditing, 8, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00225.x
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. SAGE Publications: London.
Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. G. (1985). Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 10(4), 381-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications: London.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory. In Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Org.), Handbook of Constructionist Research (pp. 397-412). The Guilford Press: New York.
Chua, W. F. (1988). Interpretive sociology and management accounting research – a critical review. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(2), 59-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004624
Chua, W. F. (2019). Radical development in accounting thought? Reflections on positivism, the impact of rankings and research diversity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 31(1), 3-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-52377
Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications: San Francisco, California.
Clarke, A. E. (2007a). Grounded theory: critiques, debates, and situational analysis. In Outhwaite, W., & Turner, S. P. (Org.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology (pp. 423-442). SAGE Publications: London.
Clarke, A. E. (2007b). Social worlds. In Ritzer, G. (Org.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 4554-4557). Blackwell Publishing: Garsington Road, Oxford.
Clarke, A. E. (2015). Stituational analyis in practive: mapping research with grounded theory. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.
Clarke, A. E. (2019). Situation grounded theory and situational analysis in interpretive qualitative inquiry. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Org.), The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory (pp. 3-48). SAGE Publications: London.
Clarke, A. E., & Friese, C. (2007). Grounded theorizing using situational analysis. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Org.), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 363-397). SAGE Publications: London.
Clarke, A. E., & Star, S. L. (2008). The social worlds framework: a theory/methods package. In Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Org.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 113-138). MIT Press: Longon, England.
Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (2013). Situtational analysis. In Kaldis, B. (Org.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences (pp. 872-874). Sage Publications: Washington DC.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3a ed). SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, USA.
Covaleski, M. & Dirsmith, M. (1983). Budgeting as a means of control and loose coupling. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 8(4), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90047-8
Covaleski, M. & Dirsmith, M. (1984). Building tents for nursing services through budgetary negotiation skills. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 8, 1-11.
Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Samuel, S. (2017). Social constructionist research in accounting: a reflection on the accounting profession. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., Covaleski, M. A., & Haynes, R. (Org). The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods (pp. 17-35). Routledge: London.
Covaleski, M., Dirsmith, M., Heian, J., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: techniques of disciplines and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293-327.
Elharidy, A., Nicholson, B., & Scapens, R. (2008). Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 5(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090810888935
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergent vs. forcing: basics of grounded theory. Sociology Press: California.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press: Mill Valley, USA.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine: New York.
Goddard, A. (2004). Budgetary practices and accountability habitus: a grounded theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 543-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554551
Goddard, A. (2005). Accounting and NPM in UK local government contributions towards governance and accountability. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(2), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00215.x
Goddard, A. (2017). Grounded theory approach to accounting studies: overview of principles, assumptions and methods. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., Covaleski, M. A., & Haynes, R. (Org). The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods (pp. 91-111). Routledge: London.
Goddard, A., & Assad, M. (2006). Accounting and navigating legitimacy in Tanzanian NGOs. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 377-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610670343
Goddard, A., & Mkasiwa, T. (2015). New public management and budgeting practices in Tanzanian central government: “struggling for conformance”. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 340-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2014-0018
Gurd, B. (2008). Remaining consistent with method? An analysis of grounded theory research in accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 5(2), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090810888926
IPSASB. (2014). Conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities. Recuperado em 4 dezembro, 2021, de: https://www.ipsasb.org/.
Jack, L., & Saulpic, O. (2019). How qualitative research can infuse teaching in accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(4), 457-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2019-0109
Lourenço, R. L., & Sauerbronn, F. F. (2016). Revistando possibilidades epistemológicas em contabilidade gerencial: em busca de contribuições de abordagens interpretativas e críticas no Brasil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13(28), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p99
Lightbody, M. (2000). Storing and shielding: financial behaviour in a church organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010323245
Lukka, K., & Modell, S. (2017). Interpretive research in accounting: past, present and future. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., Covaleski, M. A., & Haynes, R. (Org). The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods (pp. 36-54). Routledge: London.
Parker, L. D. (2001). Reactive planning in a Christian bureaucracy. Management Accounting Research, 12, 321-356. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0165
Parker, L. D. (2002). Budget incrementalism in a Christian bureaucracy. Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0171
Parker, L. D. (2014). Qualitative perspectives: through a methodological lens. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-02-2014-0013
Parker, L. D. (2017). Participant observation at the coalfase. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., Covaleski, M. A., & Haynes, R. (Org). The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods (pp. 339-353). Routledge: London.
Parker, L. D., & Roffey, B. H. (1997). Back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday account’s reality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(1), 212-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710166730
Solomon, J. F., & Solomon, A. (2006). Private social, ethical, and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 564-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610679137
Strauss, A. L. (1978). A social world perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119-128.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications: London.
Uri, T. (2015). The strengths and limitations of using situational analysis grounded theory as research methodology. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 10, 135-151.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education and Research in Accounting (REPeC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, which allows the sharing of the work and recognition of authorship and its initial publication in this journal. This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, or create derivative works, even for commercial purposes, provided credit is given for the original creation.
b)There is no financial compensation to the authors in any capacity, for articles published in RePEc.c) The articles published in RePEc are the sole responsibility of the authors.
