PERSISTENCE AND RELEVANCE OF ACCRUALS: EVIDENCES FROM THE BRAZILIAN CAPITAL MARKET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v7i4.985Keywords:
Persistence, Relevance, Accrual Anomaly.Abstract
The main objective in this research is to analyze the persistence and relevance of accruals, as well as the existence of the accrual anomaly in the Brazilian capital market. Therefore, this study is conducted by three research hypotheses: (i) the accruals are less persistent than the cash flows in the explanation of future earnings; (ii) the market does not correctly recognize the information contained in the accruals; and (iii) extraordinary gains can be obtained when using the magnitude of the accrual levels as an investment strategy. The sample included all non-financial companies traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BMF&BOVESPA) between January 1st 1995 and December 31st 2011. The results indicated that the estimated coefficient of the accrual persistence was lower than the cash flow coefficient, thus sustaining the first research hypothesis. In the second part of the research, it was verified that the market correctly prices the accrual component of earnings, as a positive and statistically significant relation exists between accruals and future stock returns, which was not expected. Finally, the results found in the third hypothesis sustain the non-existence of the accrual anomaly in the Brazilian market, as the hedge portfolios were positive in only five out of 15 years under analysis. The results obtained in this study can encourage the establishment of policies to reduce the information asymmetry, making the improper transfer of wealth to companies with a low earnings quality impossible.References
Ali, A., Hwang, L. & Trombley, M. A. (2000). Accruals and future stock returns: tests of the naive investor hypothesis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15(2), 45-63.
Amihud, Y. & Mendelson, H. (1989). The effects of beta, bid-ask spread, residual risk, and size on stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), 479-486.
Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la spéculation. Annales scientifiques de l'É.N.S., 3(17), 21-86.
Banz, R.W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2), 3-18.
Barth, M.E., Cram, D.P & Nelson, K.K. (2001). Accruals and the prediction of future cash flows. The Accounting Review, 76(1), 27-58.
Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 129-156.
Bernard, V., Thomas, J. & Wahlen, J. (1997). Accounting-based stock price anomalies: separating market inefficiencies from risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(2), 44-87.
Bradshaw, M., Richardson, S. & Sloan, R. (2001). Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals? Journal of Accounting research, 39(1), 45-74.
Brooks, C. (2002). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clubb, C. & Naffi, M. (2007). The Usefulness of Book-to-Market and ROW Expectations for Explaining UK stock returns. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34, 1-32.
Costa, N. C. A. Jr. & Neves, M.B.E. (2000). Variáveis fundamentalistas e retornos das ações. Revista Brasileira de Economia (FGV), 54(2), 123-137.
Chan, K., Chan, L. K. C., Jegadeesh, N. & Lakonishok, J. (2006). Earnings quality and stock returns. Journal of Business, 79(3), 1041-1082.
Collins, D. W., Gong, G. & Hribar, P. (2003). Investor sophistication and the mispricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 1(8), 251-276.
Collins, D. W. & Hribar, P. (2000). Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: one effect or two? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1),101-123.
Cupertino, C. M. (2010). Anomalia dos accruals no mercado brasileiro de capitais. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
Cuthbertson, K. & Nitzche, D. (2004). Quantitative financial economics. (2a ed). West Sussex: Wiley.
Dechow, P. M. & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review, 77(2), 35-59.
Desai, H., Rajgopal, S. & Venkatachalam, M. (2004). Value-glamour and accruals mispricing: one anomaly or two. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 355-385.
Fairfield, P., Whisenant, J. & Yohn, T. (2003). Accrued earnings and growth: implications for future profitability and market mispricing. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 353-371.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Fama, E. F. & French, K. R (1995). Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 131-155.
Fama, E. F. & French, K. R (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
Gabrielsson, T. & Giaever, H. (2007). The accruals anomaly in Sweden. Dissertação de mestrado, Lund University, Lund, Suécia.
Jegadeesh, N. & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 65-91.
Khan, M. (2008). Are accruals mispriced? Evidence from tests of an intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2), 55-77.
Kothari, S.P., Loutskina, E. & Nikolaev, V. (2008). Agency theory of overvalued equity as an explanation for the accrual anomaly [Working Paper]. University of Virginia. Recuperado em 14 de abril de 2012, de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.144.7499.
Lafond, R. (2005). Is the accrual anomaly a global anomaly? [Working Paper], MIT Sloan School of Management Recuperado em 1 de outubro de 2011, de http://ssrn.com/paper=782726.
Lev, D. M. & Nissim, D. (2006). The persistence of the accruals anomaly. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 193-226.
Lopes. A.B. & Martins, E. (2005). Teoria da contabilidade: uma nova abordagem. São Paulo: Atlas.
Lustosa, P. R. B., Fernandes, J. L. T., Nunes, D. M. S. & Araújo, J. B., Jr (2010).. Estimativas contábeis e qualidade do lucro: análise setorial no Brasil. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 4(2), 43-61.
Machado, M. A. V. & Medeiros, O. R. (2011). Modelos de precificação de ativos e o efeito liquidez: evidências empíricas no mercado acionário brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 9(3), 383-412.
Markowitz, H. H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(77), 91.
Martins, G. (2002). Manual para elaboração de monografias e dissertações. (3a ed.) São Paulo: Atlas.
Mashuwala, C., Rajgopal, S. & Shevlin, T. (2006). Why is the accrual anomaly not arbitraged away? The role of idiosyncratic risk and transaction cost. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(1-2), 3-33.
Palmon, D., Sudit, E. & Yezegel, A. (2008). The accruals anomaly and company size. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(5), 47-60.
Pincus, M., Rajgopal, S. & Venkatachalam, M. (2007). The accrual anomaly: international evidence. Accounting Review, 82(1), 169-203.
Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T. & Tuna, A. I (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 437-485.
Sharp. E, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Financial, 19(2), 425-442.
Sewell, M. (2011). History of the efficient market hypothesis. UCL Research, 11(4), 11-35.
Sloan, R.G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Review, 71(3), 289-315.
Soares, R. O., Rostagno, L. M., & Soares, K. T. C. (2002, setembro). Estudo de eventos: o método e as formas de cálculo do retorno anormal. Anais do Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, Salvador, BA, Brasil, 26.
Stattman, D. (1980). Book values and stock returns. A Journal of Slected Papers, 4(1), 25-45.
Takamatsu, R. T. (2011). Accruals contábeis, persistência dos lucros e retorno das ações. Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Taylor, G. & Xu, R. Z. (2011). Accruals and value/glamour anomalies: the same or related phenomena? International Journal of Business and Management, 6(9), 14-23.
Thomas, J. & Zhang, H. (2002). Inventory changes and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2), 163-187.
Vaihekoski, M. (2004). Portfolio construction for tests of asset pricing models. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 13(1), 1-39.
Xie, H. (2001). The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 357-373.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, which allows the sharing of the work and recognition of authorship and its initial publication in this journal. This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, or create derivative works, even for commercial purposes, provided credit is given for the original creation.
b)There is no financial compensation to the authors in any capacity, for articles published in RePEc.c) The articles published in RePEc are the sole responsibility of the authors.
